What do you think of those who say there's nothing after the end of namarupa?

Reading Venerable Bodhi’s note we can see that his conclusions are based on Suttanta, Abhidhamma and Commentary. Of course some might feel his emphasis leans to the side of either annihilationism or eternalism but that may be because we have our own bias to either side ( for example do we focus on the fact that Nibbāna does not arise, or are we focused on the fact that Nibbāna does not cease)…

I am closing this thread at this stage but anyone is welcome to start a new thread on a related topic.