I thought this is where he differs from Classical Theravada? Reifying Parinibbāna as something as opposed to nothing.
Directly contradicting this: Help for responding to people who say: Buddha never said there's nothing after parinibbana
I thought this is where he differs from Classical Theravada? Reifying Parinibbāna as something as opposed to nothing.
Directly contradicting this: Help for responding to people who say: Buddha never said there's nothing after parinibbana