Great questions Paulo, welcome to the forum.
This sutta explains very well.
Yamaka Sutta and Commentary
The Commentary notes that Spk: If he had thought, “Formations arise and cease; a simple process offormations reaches nonoccurrence, this would not be a view (diṭṭhigata) but
knowledge in accordance with the Teaching .But since he thought, A being is
annihilated and destroyed,” this becomes a view.
All samsara is is the arising and ceasing of conditioned elements, thus no self at all. Each stream of arising and ceasing elements is of course entirely different from another, thus terms like people, me , him, they, are necessary designations. But without the teaching these conceptual referents are given a quality they don’t have: real, permanent, sukkha etc.
Now to answer your question: yes the term is khandha parinibbana - the ceasing of the aggregates. Just as Renaldo said:
The Dispeller of Delusion (pali text society) trans. Bhikku Nanamoli:
page 121, volume1:
"this division too should be known, namely momentary death (khanika-
marana), conventional death (samutti marana) and death as cutting
off (samuccheda-marana)
also Vism. xliii “
There are three kinds of death: death as
cutting off, momentary death, and conventional death. Death as cutting off belongs
to those whose cankers are exhausted (and are Arahants). Momentary death is
that of each consciousness of the cognitive series beginning with life-continuum
consciousness, which arise each immediately on the cessation of the one preceding.
Conventional death is that of all (so-called) living beings
Samuccheda-marana is the final death of the arahat.