I’m referencing the immigration and visa laws.
One should stay with a preceptor or proper nissaya teacher until Nissaya Muktaka is finished. This is vinaya. One needs to get permission from the preceptor to go to another place and show that he will go to a proper place with a proper teacher. He should not let him go if there is no proper teacher. Is your preceptor properly qualified according to vinaya to be a preceptor. I highly doubt it, but it is rarely practiced (even though it does not negate the rule). The ordination is still valid.
I’m sure if you asked to stay at sbs you could stay there, especially if you ordained there. Furthermore, there are no visa issues for you. However, I’m not sure an ebt-sbs is the best place for classical theravadans.
Getting tired of moving from place to place might be part of the reverse psychology training against travel. Maybe to get it out of your system. But one problem is, that you don’t have a settling nature to begin with. You will likely want to leave within a 10 month period, if that is the longest you have stayed in one place. When I first ordained at pa-auk in 2001, one was not allowed to travel at all. It was against the pa-auk visa permission policies. There were 7 checkpoints from Mawlamyine to Yangon and you needed a good reason to go. You needed a special letter from the monastery. If you didn’t have that letter, Sayadawgyi would get a call from the checkpoint area and then Sayadawgyi would complain to me (and others) about who was breaking the rules. I didn’t travel to Bagan until 2016 even though I ordained in 2001. I finally got the courage to ask for permission and brought a senior local pa-auk monk with me as a bargaining piece to get permission.