How life began and evolutionary theory

[RobertK]

@Dōgen

Likewise, a traditionalist person would be better of learning about the right view rather than trying to exhaust the inexhaustible supply of wrong view.

Wrong view as it’s defined in suttas, would literally be endless, we can come up with infinite things that doesn’t make sense from dhammic perspective.

Right view is handful of leaves. Better to focus on what matters and use discernment to know what to ignore.

It depends. I bring these points up if I think it might help someone.
For example this topic: Heart base - or brain
The person I wrote to had decided the Commentaries were not to trusted so I tried to help.

Many Buddhist are impressed by science. And that is to be expected, after all we spend decades - at school and via media- hearing of the advances in science. And science incarnates as trips to the moon, medical advances, architecture and so on.
That is all fine but some Buddhist then assume the Scientific Picture of the World , which is based on scientists opinions, as having been ‘proven by science’. This can lead to many doubts - that a voice saying “wait a minute, is this absolutely true?”, may allay.