I looked into your question, and have an answer from the commentary works. However, every time we talk you make abundantly clear that your final, unchangeable position is based on something you call “direct seeing,” which is your personal understanding of the dhamma, and is not attested in the Classical Theravada, but rather is diametrically opposed to it, and you will accept no other ideas but this. Do you really want to learn about the Classical Theravada position on the fetters? Or will you cast it aside and declare your “direct seeing” superior, as usual?
If the former, I’ll happily share what I’ve found. If you are finished with your personal take on the dhamma and are here to learn about Classical Theravada I will be thrilled and have a lot to discuss with you. You seem a clever person, and so I’m sure you’ll be able to find a great deal of valuable knowledge in the CT tradition, and it would be great to discuss it with you 
.
However if the latter, I’ll pass.